Back to Case Studies

ENGAGEMENT DOSSIER

Defense Information Systems Acquisition Governance

Enterprise digital backbone acquisition within the Department of Defense

Organization
Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA), United States Department of Defense
Authority Type
Enterprise Telecommunications and Digital Infrastructure Acquisition (Official Position: Contract Specialist)
Institutional Environment
Department of Defense Combat Support Agency responsible for global communications and network architecture
Duration
50 months (August 2016 – September 2020)

Sustained acquisition execution within the Defense Information Systems Agency supporting enterprise telecommunications, transport systems, and satellite communications portfolios embedded within the Department of Defense's global digital backbone. Engagement occurred inside large-scale, multi-vendor contract architectures governing network sustainment, secure data transport, and mission-critical communications infrastructure across the defense enterprise.

Institutional Environment

The Defense Information Systems Agency serves as the digital infrastructure authority of the Department of Defense. As a Combat Support Agency, DISA sustains the communications architecture enabling command connectivity, global data routing, satellite communications capability, and cross-domain information exchange across military services and combatant commands.

Telecommunications and transport portfolios within DISA are structural components of defense information continuity. Enterprise contract vehicles operate within a multi-billion-dollar annual funding ecosystem and support geographically distributed installations and operational theaters. Infrastructure reliability within this environment directly affects command coordination and operational synchronization.

Acquisition activity in this context is embedded within cybersecurity mandates, statutory oversight frameworks, fiscal law constraint, and continuous audit visibility. Contract architecture decisions influence recurring infrastructure expenditures and network stability across the defense enterprise.

Engagement Scope

Across five consecutive years of portfolio immersion, Klemmer operated within enterprise telecommunications and transport systems acquisition environments supporting network sustainment, SATCOM portfolios, and enterprise IT service vehicles.

Engagement included contract formation support within long-duration IDIQ frameworks, structured cost and price analysis prior to award execution, lifecycle modification sequencing aligned to evolving technical standards, and acquisition documentation preparation within layered technical, legal, cybersecurity, and financial review structures.

Telecommunications acquisition differs from commodity procurement. Carrier pricing models, service-level performance expectations, interoperability requirements, and cybersecurity controls must be reconciled within durable contract architecture. Decisions at formation stage influence recurring service expenditures and infrastructure continuity across performance horizons.

While obligation authority resided with warranted contracting officers, acquisition work product directly informed fiduciary decisions affecting enterprise telecommunications vehicles operating at scale.

Authority Framework

Obligation authority resided with warranted contracting officers. Acquisition work product — contract formation support, structured price analysis, lifecycle modification sequencing — directly informed fiduciary decisions affecting enterprise telecommunications vehicles operating at scale.

Authority was exercised within federal procurement statutes and Department of Defense governance frameworks. Contract actions integrated technical evaluation, cybersecurity compliance review, fiscal validation, and legal sufficiency prior to entering the obligation chain.

Capital Authority Exposure

Enterprise telecommunications and transport systems portfolios within DISA function inside a multi-billion-dollar annual acquisition framework supporting global network sustainment and digital modernization initiatives.

Supported portfolios included scalable service vehicles and task order environments where lifecycle exposure extended into the billions of dollars. In telecommunications architecture, capital consequence is cumulative. Pricing structure, modification discipline, and option sequencing influence downstream fiscal exposure beyond initial award value.

Structured price analysis supported defensible cost posture prior to obligation. Funding alignment was validated against statutory purpose and period constraints. Lifecycle modification tracking preserved contractual integrity across long-duration infrastructure vehicles.

Disciplined acquisition execution contributed to maintaining pricing defensibility and contract stability within enterprise communications portfolios underpinning defense information systems.

Governance Architecture

Governance within DISA telecommunications acquisition is layered and continuous. Contract actions integrate technical evaluation, cybersecurity compliance review, fiscal validation, and legal sufficiency prior to entering the obligation chain.

Sustained execution across fifty months reinforced repeatable acquisition discipline within transport systems and SATCOM portfolios operating under evolving technical and security standards. Documentation integrity, pricing defensibility, and lifecycle sequencing preserved audit resilience and protest defensibility within high-visibility infrastructure vehicles.

Enterprise telecommunications governance is measured by stability under scale and complexity rather than episodic control.

Operational Throughput

Execution required disciplined coordination under time constraint across enterprise telecommunications and transport systems acquisition environments. Sustained exposure across fifty months reinforced throughput discipline within network sustainment, SATCOM portfolios, and enterprise IT service vehicles operating under mission-driven prioritization.

Risk and Control Discipline

Telecommunications and transport systems portfolios underpin global defense communications, satellite connectivity, and data movement across operational environments. Service instability carries mission consequence.

Acquisition execution in this setting required disciplined coordination under time constraint, pricing rigor within multi-carrier ecosystems, and structured documentation under statutory oversight. Risk domains included regulatory non-compliance, fiscal misalignment, vendor protest exposure, cybersecurity integration failure, and potential network service disruption.

Preventive controls were embedded within acquisition formation and modification processes. Pricing positions were tested prior to obligation. Competition documentation preserved defensibility within multi-vendor environments. Funding alignment was validated against statutory constraints. Lifecycle sequencing protected infrastructure continuity.

Sustained exposure to these portfolios reinforced disciplined execution within a defense digital ecosystem operating under continuous operational reliance.

Structural Significance

The structural significance of this engagement lies in sustained acquisition immersion within the Department of Defense communications backbone.

DISA telecommunications and transport systems portfolios support network routing, satellite communications capability, and enterprise data movement across defense components. Acquisition execution within this architecture contributes to maintaining stability of digital infrastructure upon which operational command environments depend.

Across fifty months of continuous engagement, disciplined contract formation support, pricing analysis rigor, and lifecycle sequencing reinforced continuity within complex telecommunications ecosystems defined by scale, interdependence, and mission consequence.

Governance maturity at this level is reflected in sustained reliability under infrastructure dependency.